Project Quality Risk Identification and Assessment Strategy Analysis

Authors

  • Jingcheng Zhang School of Management, Northeastern University, Qinhuangdao, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/w7xy8152

Keywords:

Project quality risk; identification and control; refinement and optimization; risk management.

Abstract

In the current context of increasingly fierce market competition, project quality has become an important factor for modern enterprises to improve their own competitiveness, and whether the project is successful or not. But there are so many uncertainties― project quality risks―in all stages of the project's life cycle. Neglecting the identification and management of these risks may lead to severe, even irreversible consequences. This paper first explains the importance of project quality risk identification and evaluation. It then examines the theoretical foundations and limitations of existing mainstream project quality risk identification strategies and evaluation methods. Finally, this includes the introduction of big data analytics to enhance the accuracy of risk identification. It makes some improvements and optimizations to solve the shortcomings of mainstream exams. to improve the scientific nature, the adaptability, and the decision credibility of risk management, and to gradually form a more intelligent, dynamic, and integrative project's quality risk management system, provide assurance for project success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) – Seventh edition and the standard for project management. Project Management Institute, 2021.

[2] Wang Z, Shen J. Research on quality risk transmission models and simulation for construction projects. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2018, 38 (4): 1055-1066.

[3] Chin K S, Chan A, Yang J B. Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 36 (7-8): 633-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0898-3

[4] Li W, Liang W, Zhang L, et al. A dynamic Bayesian network-based approach for modeling and assessing hidden risks in complex projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2021, 37 (5): 402-409.

[5] Antony J, Lizarelli F L, Fernandes M M, et al. The effect of Lean Six Sigma practices on quality performance in the healthcare sector: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2023, 34 (14): 1588-1612

[6] Wang Z, Hu H, Zhou W, et al. A novel quality risk propagation model considering rework in complex product development projects. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 17 (5): 108852.

[7] Crosby P B. Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, 1979.

[8] Rose K H. Advancing project quality management: integrating planning and control for superior performance. Project Management Institute, 2022.

[9] Pinto J K, Müller R. The interplay of quality culture and process compliance in project quality assurance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2022, 15 (3): 455-473.

[10] Zeng S X, Lou G X, Tam V W Y. Managing quality risk in supply chain to drive firm's performance: the roles of control mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 80 (2): 188-197.

[11] Selvaraj R, Muthuswami M. The impact of risk management maturity on project success in traditional industries. Journal of Modern Project Management, 2020, 8 (2): 88-103.

[12] Taha H A. Operations research: an introduction. 11th ed. Pearson Education, 2022.

[13] Zhang Y. Risk response strategies in construction projects: an empirical analysis of efficacy. Project Management Journal, 2021, 52 (1): 75-90.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Zhang, J. (2025). Project Quality Risk Identification and Assessment Strategy Analysis. Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, 5, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.62051/w7xy8152