Integrated Technology and System for Risk and Safety Management in Smart Construction

Authors

  • Boyi Wang College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74075, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/21dmgk35

Keywords:

Smart Construction Site; Internet of Things (IoT); Integrated Risk and Safety Management (IRSM); Digital Twin; Construction 4.0.

Abstract

With the advancement of the “dual carbon” strategy and the acceleration of digital transformation in the construction industry, smart construction sites have become a key path to enhancing construction safety and efficiency. This article systematically reviews the application of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in the integrated management of risks and safety in intelligent construction, covering the system architecture, key technologies, typical application scenarios, and future development trends. It analyzes the four-layer IoT architecture (perception, network, platform, and application) and explores the synergistic role of key technologies, including BIM, digital twins, AI video analytics, and electronic geofencing. Case studies demonstrate that this IoT-driven approach to IRSM can significantly reduce injury rates, shorten project durations, and improve overall operational efficiency. Finally, the study identifies persistent challenges—including technical integration complexities, data security concerns, and cost-benefit standardization—and proposes future research directions towards the integration of 5G, AI, edge computing, and green construction principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Arun Kumar, Sharad Sharma, Nitin Goyal, Aman Singh, Xiaochun Cheng, Parminder Singh. Secure and energy-efficient smart building architecture with emerging technology IoT. Computer Communications, 2021, 176, 207-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.06.003

[2] Rolando Chacon, Hector Posada, Carlos Ramonell, Manuel Jungmann, Timo Hartmann, Rehan Khan, Rahul Tomar. Digital twinning of building construction processes. Case study: A reinforced concrete cast-in structure. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 84, 108522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108522

[3] Xia Luyao, Lu Jianfeng, Zhang Hao, Xu Mengying, Li Zhaojia. Construction and application of a smart factory digital twin system based on DTME. The international journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 120(5), 4159-4178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08971-1

[4] Sofiat O. Abioye, Lukumon O. Oyedele, Lukman Akanbi, Anuoluwapo Ajayi, Juan Manuel Davila Delgado, Muhammad Bilal, Olugbenga O. Akinade, Ashraf Ahmed. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44, 103299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299

[5] Chui Michael, and S. Francisco. Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier. McKinsey and Company Global Institute, 2017, 47(3): 6-8.

[6] Ribeiro, Marco Tulio, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. Why Should I Trust You?: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier, California, San Francisco, 2016, 1135-1144. ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

[7] Binder, Alexander, et al. Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization layers, Springer, Barcelona, 2016, 63-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44781-0_8

[8] Frank, Jeremy. Artificial Intelligence and intrusion detection: current and future directions. S.l, in: Proceedings of the 17th National Computer Security Conference, 1994, 1-12.

[9] Oyedele, Lukumon O., et al. Critical factors affecting construction quality in Nigeria: evidence from industry professionals. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2015, 6(2): 103-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2015.1033662

[10] Huang Ling et al. Adversarial machine learning. Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence, 2011, 43-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2046684.2046692

[11] De-Graft Joe Opoku, Srinath Perera, Robert Osei-Kyei, Maria Rashidi, Keivan Bamdad, and Tosin Famakinwa. Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Twin in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. MDPI, 2023, 10 (1): 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010014

[12] Qi, Qinglin, and Fei Tao. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. Ieee Access, 2018, 6: 3585-3593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265

[13] Ayoub, Mohammed. A review on machine learning algorithms to predict daylighting inside buildings. Solar energy, 2020, 202: 249-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.104

[14] Botín-Sanabria, Diego M., et al. Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(6): 1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335

[15] Liu Zhen, et al. Immersive technologies-driven building information modeling (BIM) in the context of metaverse. Buildings, 2023, 13(6): 1559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559

[16] Latif, Kamran, Abubakar Sharafat, and Jongwon Seo. Digital twin-driven framework for TBM performance prediction, visualization, and monitoring through machine learning. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(20): 11435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011435

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Wang, B. (2025). Integrated Technology and System for Risk and Safety Management in Smart Construction. Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, 5, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.62051/21dmgk35